Skip to main content
Monthly Archives

December 2018

After Losing Midterms on Health Care, Here Are Eight Ways the Republican War on Health Care Rages On

Last month, Republicans got a thumping at the polls in large part due to their continued health care repeal-and-sabotage efforts. Health care was the top issue among voters of all backgrounds, who handed Democrats control of the House, flipped seven governors’ mansions, and elected to expand health care, even in deep red states. Unfortunately, Republicans across the country and the Trump Administration didn’t get the memo, and their reckless agenda has continued unabated.

Here’s what they’ve been up to, and how their actions are harming Americans:

  1. THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION’S SABOTAGE OF OPEN ENROLLMENT IS PREVENTING INDIVIDUALS FROM OBTAINING COVERAGE

As open enrollment comes to its conclusion, individuals attempting to obtain coverage for 2019 have once again been harmed by Administration’s rampant sabotage efforts. The Administration slashed the sign-up period in half, cut navigator funding by 84 percent, pushed enrollment for junk plans which charge more money for less care and can deny coverage to people with pre-existing conditions, and again scheduled maintenance during the sign-up period. Taken together, these actions are expected to reduce Americans’ access to care, which national data is bearing out: A recent analysis of the first month of this year’s open enrollment period  found that enrollment was down nearly 13 percent compared to last year.

  1. THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION HAS KICKED THOUSANDS OF AMERICANS OFF THEIR HEALTH INSURANCE

The Trump Administration has doubled down on imposing onerous Medicaid requirements designed to make it even harder for Americans to access health care. On Sunday, the Administration filed a motion to dismiss a lawsuit over its Arkansas-approved waiver, which has kicked more than 12,000 Arkansans off of their health insurance since its approval just three months ago.

Two weeks ago the Administration re-approved a Kentucky waiver containing work requirements, previously rejected by a federal judge who ruled the state failed to consider whether it would “in fact [help furnish] medical assistance to its citizens” and was estimated to kick 95,000 Kentuckians off of their insurance.”

The Administration has approved similar waivers in Indiana, New Hampshire, and Wisconsin, all of which will kick Americans off of their insurance while failing to promote work, as study after study has shown.

  1. THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION IS PUSHING STATES TO ALLOW INSURANCE COMPANIES TO SELL JUNK PLANS THAT CIRCUMVENT CRUCIAL PROTECTIONS AMERICANS DEPEND ON

Last week, the Trump Administration issued new insurance guidance, encouraging states to “tear down pillars” of the Affordable Care Act. This move would allow federal subsidies to be used to purchase junk plans that are not required to cover pre-existing conditions, hospitalization, or prescription drugs. What will this mean?

  • Larry Levitt, Senior Vice President of Kaiser Family Foundation: 1332 waiver guidance gives states much the same flexibility as repeal would. [Business Insider, 10/22/18]
  • Timothy Jost, Washington and Lee University Law Professor: “Invariably, the coverage is going to be more expensive for people who really need comprehensive coverage.[Kaiser Health News, 11/29/18]
  • American Lung Association: New 1332 waiver guidance “Would further erode patient protections, undermine care for people with lung disease.” [American Lung Association, 11/29/18]
  • HuffPost: Rule change “almost certainly means that, overall, people with serious medical problems are likely to have a harder time finding coverage.” [HuffPost, 10/22/18]
  • Axios: Administration’s waiver “could add up to one of its most substantive blows yet against the affordable care act.”  [Axios, 10/23/18]
  1. THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION ALSO APPEARS TO BE STEERING MEDICARE BENEFICIARIES TO PRIVATE PLANS

In another potential giveaway to Big Insurance from the Trump Administration, emails sent to Medicare beneficiaries by HHS appear to be steering them to private Medicare Advantage programs, over Medicare. Said Richard S. Foster, formerly the nonpartisan actuary of the Medicare program, told the New York Times the emails sounded “more like Medicare Advantage plan advertising than objective information from a public agency.”

  1. THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION HAS CAUSED THE CHILDREN’S UNINSURED RATE TO DRASTICALLY INCREASE FOR THE FIRST TIME IN YEARS

Last week, the Georgetown University Center for Children and Families released a new report on the uninsured rate for children, and for the first time, the number and rate of uninsured children in the United States went up. Trump-GOP health care sabotage are chief among the reasons for the increase.

  1. THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION CONTINUES TO TRY TO END PRE-EXISTING CONDITIONS PROTECTIONS IN COURT, AS PART OF A COORDINATED GOP EFFORT TO REPEAL THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT AND RIP HEALTH CARE AWAY FROM MILLIONS

Any day now, a conservative federal judge in Texas is expected to rule on a lawsuit filed by a coalition of Republican attorneys general, and supported by the Trump Administration, that is designed to overturn the Affordable Care Act, including its protections for people with pre-existing conditions.

  1. WISCONSIN REPUBLICANS ARE TRYING TO DENY THE DULY ELECTED INCOMING DEMOCRATIC GOVERNOR AND ATTORNEY GENERAL THE AUTHORITY TO PULL WISCONSIN OUT THE LAWSUIT TO OVERTURN THE ACA AND END PRE-EXISTING CONDITIONS PROTECTIONS

Despite polls showing health care was the top issue for Wisconsin voters — and that they overwhelmingly favored Democrats on it, propelling them to victory in statewide race — Wisconsin Republicans passed legislation that seeks to deny the duly elected incoming Democratic Governor and Attorney General from withdrawing participation in Walker-Schimel-Trump’s assault on pre-existing conditions in federal court.

  1. TRUMP ADMINISTRATION APPROVES FLORIDA’S REQUEST TO RESTRICT RETROACTIVE MEDICAID ELIGIBILITY

Early this week, Florida received federal approval to shorten the amount of time people who sign up for Medicaid have for retroactive eligibility from 90 days to just 30. Critics charge that this change will hurt both patients and providers and that it will limit access to health care services for older patients and people with disabilities.

…MEANWHILE, THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION GLOSSES OVER ITS RECORD WITH PHONY, FANCY “REPORTS”

A so-called “report” from the Department of Health and Human Services was actually “stuffed with conservative talking points” and “potshots at the Affordable Care Act,” according to Axios, rather than any substantive information about how the Trump administration plans to address the top health care concerns of the American people: lowering the cost of prescription drugs, ending junk insurance plans, funding Medicaid and Medicare and maintaining pre-existing conditions protections.

BREAKING: Wisconsin Republicans’ Pre-Existing Conditions Fraud

Senate Passes Bill Keeping Wisconsin in Pre-Existing Conditions Lawsuit, Despite Voters’ Wishes

Republicans Did Not Have Support to Even Pretend to Protect Pre-Existing Conditions as Walker Promised

Washington, D.C. – After hours of closed door debate, Republicans in the Wisconsin Senate failed to muster enough support to for legislation that they falsely claimed would ensure protections for people with pre-existing conditions, despite their efforts to invalidate them in federal court. This bill comes after Republican Senators passed legislation that seeks to deny the duly elected incoming Democratic Governor and Attorney General from withdrawing participating in Walker-Schimel-Trump’s assault on pre-existing conditions in federal court. That bill passed the legislature and now heads to the Governor.

Brad Woodhouse, executive director of Protect Our Care, released the following statement in response:

“I’d like to thank the Wisconsin Republicans who just proved that all of Scott Walker’s crocodile tears on the campaign trail about protecting people with pre-existing conditions were a total charade. For a decade, Wisconsin Republicans have tried to repeal the Affordable Care Act and its protections for the 2.4 million Wisconsinites living with pre-existing conditions, and that has never changed.

“By digging their heels in on their lawsuit to eliminate pre-existing conditions and repeal the Affordable Care Act, Scott Walker, Brad Schimel, and Wisconsin Republicans are proving they don’t really care about the health of their constituents and that they’ve learned nothing from the outcome of November’s election. Tony Evers and Josh Kaul were elected because of their pro-health care positions, including their pledges to withdraw from the Walker-Schimel-Trump lawsuit to overturn the Affordable Care Act and its protections for people with pre-existing conditions, and the will of the voters should be respected.”

BACKGROUND:

MILLIONS OF WISCONSINITES AT RISK

2,435,700 Wisconsinites Live With A Pre-Existing Condition. About one in two Wisconsinites, 51 percent, lives with a pre-existing condition. [Center for American Progress, 4/5/17]

1,187,000 Wisconsin Women And Girls Have A Pre-Existing Condition. Approximately 1,187,000 women and girls in Wisconsin live with a pre-existing condition. [Center for American Progress and the National Partnership For Women and Families, June 2018]

308,100 Wisconsin Children Already Have A Pre-Existing Condition. Roughly 308,000 Wisconsinites below age 18 live with a pre-existing condition. [Center for American Progress, 4/5/17]

616,900 Older Wisconsinites Live With A Pre-Existing Condition. 616,900 Wisconsin adults between the ages of 55 and 64 live with at least one pre-existing condition, meaning attacks on these protections significantly threaten Wisconsinites approaching Medicare age. [Center for American Progress, 4/5/17]

THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT OUTLAWED DISCRIMINATION BASED ON PRE-EXISTING CONDITIONS — GOP LAWSUIT TO OVERTURN THE LAW BRINGS DISCRIMINATION AGAINST PRE-EXISTING CONDITIONS BACK

Because Of The Affordable Care Act, Insurance Companies Can No Longer Deny Coverage Or Charge More Because Of Pre-Existing Conditions. Under current law, health insurance companies can’t refuse to cover you or charge you more just because you have a ‘pre-existing condition’ — that is, a health problem you had before the date that new health coverage starts.” [HHS]

The ACA Outlawed Medical Underwriting, The Practice That Let Insurance Companies Charge Sick People And Women More. As the Brookings Institution summarizes, “The ACA outlawed medical underwriting, which had enabled insurance carriers to court the healthiest customers while denying coverage to people likely to need costly care. The ACA guaranteed that all applicants could buy insurance and that their premiums would not be adjusted for gender or personal characteristics other than age and smoking.”

The ACA Stopped Companies From Charging Women More Than Men For The Same Plan. The Affordable Care Act eliminated “gender rating,” meaning American women no longer have to pay an aggregated $1 billion more per year than men for the same coverage.

Thanks To The Affordable Care Act, Insurance Companies Can No Longer Rescind Coverage Because of Illness. Because of the ACA, insurance companies can no longer rescind or cancel someone’s coverage arbitrarily if they get sick.

HEALTH CARE WAS THE TOP ISSUE FOR WISCONSIN VOTERS

A Public Policy Polling election day survey of Wisconsin voters found that health care was the top issue for voters in the state — and that they overwhelmingly favored Democrats on it, propelling Tony Evers to victory.

 

  • 68% of voters said that health care was either a very important issue, or the most important issue to them. Those voters supported Evers over Scott Walker 65-33.
  • When asked to name the single issue most important to them in 2018, a plurality (27%) picked health care. Among those voters who said health care was their single most important issue in the election, Evers defeated Walker by a whopping 89-7 margin.
  • Evers especially had an advantage over Walker when it came to the issue of who voters trusted more to protect people with pre-existing conditions. 50% preferred Evers to protect pre-existing conditions to only 41% who preferred Walker.
  • Scott Walker’s support for the Republican health care repeal agenda hurt him badly. Only 32% of voters said his support for repeal made them more likely to vote for him, while 47% said it made them less likely to support him.
  • An overwhelming majority of Wisconsinites want to see the Affordable Care Act stay in place – 62% think it should be kept with fixes made to it as necessary, compared to only 32% of voters who support repealing it.

New Report is Another Health Care Bait-and-Switch from the Trump Administration

New Report is More Hot Air As the Trump-GOP War on Health Care Rolls On

Washington, DC – Today, the Trump Administration released a report that is nothing more than a bait-and-switch on health care from an Administration whose primary health care agenda is to take Americans’ coverage away. In response, Brad Woodhouse, executive director of Protect Our Care, issued the following statement:

“No fancy report is going to change the fact that when it comes to health care, the Trump Administration’s real goals are crystal clear: to erode protections Americans depend on, like those for individuals with pre-existing conditions; to make people pay more money for less coverage; and to do whatever they can to get rid of or dismantle Medicare, Medicaid and the Affordable Care Act.”

Though they’re trying to distract from it, here’s the Trump Administration’s real health care record:

TRUMP AND REPUBLICANS ARE WORKING TO END PROTECTIONS FOR PRE-EXISTING CONDITIONS

If federal courts rule in favor of the Trump Administration and Republican attorneys general, protections for people with pre-existing conditions would vanish overnight, unleashing chaos in our entire health care system.

In addition to going to court to eliminate pre-existing conditions protections, the Trump Administration is urging states to skirt consumer protections in the Affordable Care Act through regulatory waivers.

TRUMP IS PUSHING JUNK PLANS THAT EXCLUDE COVERAGE OF PRE-EXISTING CONDITIONS

Short-Term Plans May Exclude Coverage For Pre-Existing Conditions. “Policyholders who get sick may be investigated by the insurer to determine whether the newly-diagnosed condition could be considered pre-existing and so excluded from coverage.” [Kaiser Family Foundation, 2/9/18]

Short-Term Junk Plans Can Refuse To Cover Essential Health Benefits and Prescription Drugs. “Typical short-term policies do not cover maternity care, prescription drugs, mental health care, preventive care, and other essential benefits, and may limit coverage in other ways.” [Kaiser Family Foundation, 2/9/18]

Short-Term Junk Plans Can Retroactively Cancel Coverage After Patients File Claims. “Individuals in STLDI plans would be at risk for rescission. Rescissions are retroactive cancellations of coverage, often occurring after individuals file claims due to medical necessity. While enrollees in ACA coverage cannot have their policy retroactively cancelled, enrollees in STLDI plans can.” [Wakely/ACAP, April 2018]

Junk Plans Are Notorious For The Scams They Attract. “Once the new rules were announced, vendors both fraudulent and legitimate adapted to market these short-term plans as the lines between the two became even more blurry. (The plans favored by our scam-happy president are also, unsurprisingly, historically scammy.)…As the administration promised, there are certainly more options, but there’s also not much by way of a filter. Since last summer, the federal budget for ‘insurance navigators’—the people you can call to parse your government-funded options, including Medicare and state healthcare—has been cut by 80%.” [Splinter, 11/21/18]

TRUMP’S HEALTH CARE SABOTAGE IS DRIVING COSTS UP FOR CONSUMERS

Larry Levitt, Senior Vice President Of Kaiser Family Foundation: Premiums Would Be Going Down If Not For Insurance Companies Compensating For Unstable Environment. “ACA premiums are stable for 2019 because they went up so much this year due to an uncertain environment and regulatory actions by the Trump administration. Premiums would be going down a lot if not for repeal of the individual mandate penalty and expansion of short-term plans.” [Levitt, 9/27/18]

Brookings Analysis Estimates That Individual Market Premiums Would Fall By 4.3 Percent In 2019 If Not For GOP Sabotage. [Brookings Institution, 8/1/18]

Health Care Analyst, Charles Gaba Has Calculated That Across The Country, Premiums Will Increase By An Average Of 2.8 Percent In 2019. The average premium increases indicate that premiums nationwide will be 8.1 percent higher than they would have been absent GOP sabotage. [Charles Gaba, Accessed 12/3/18]

TRUMP AND REPUBLICANS WANT TO UNDERMINE MEDICAID AND MEDICARE

President Trump’s FY 2019 budget proposed $1.4 trillion in cuts to Medicaid. In February, President Trump proposed a budget that would have gutted Medicaid by $1.4 trillion.

President Trump and Congressional Republicans are targeting Medicare and Medicaid to pay for tax cuts for the wealthiest. Last December, President Trump signed a $1.5 trillion tax bill that disproportionately benefits the wealthy. In an attempt to pay for these tax cuts, in April, House Republicans passed a budget amendment that would slash Medicare funding by $537 billion over the next decade.

Congressional Republicans proposed these cuts after passing a budget resolution last year that cut Medicare by $473 billion. The 2018 budget resolution passed by Republicans in December 2017 cut Medicare by $473 billion.

Larry Kudlow, Director of the National Economic Council, confirmed that he has his sights on cutting Medicare. Asked when programs like Social Security and Medicare will be looked at for reforms, Kudlow replied, “Everyone will look at that — probably next year.”

As the cost of drugs skyrocket, President Trump and his Republican allies in Congress will not allow Medicare to negotiate for better prescription drug prices. Under current law, the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is explicitly prohibited from negotiating directly with drug manufacturers on behalf of Medicare Part D enrollees. Although it would decrease both federal spending and beneficiaries’ out-of-pocket costs for prescription drugs, a policy allowing the federal government to negotiate drug prices for Medicare beneficiaries was noticeably absent from President Trump’s recent prescription drug announcement.  

Congressional Republicans repealed several components of the ACA designed to help keep Medicare’s costs down, effectively driving up costs for the program. By repealing the requirement that most people have insurance, Congressional Republicans knowingly voted for a measure expected to increase the number of uninsured. The 2018 Medicare Trustees Report predicts that this increase will increase the share of subsidies paid to hospitals via Medicare. Similarly, by repealing the Independent Payment Advisory Board, Congressional Republicans took away a mechanism that slowed Medicare cost growth.

TRUMP’S HRAs WILL FURTHER ERODE AMERICANS’ ACCESS TO AFFORDABLE HEALTH CARE

Standalone HRAs By Definition Contain An Annual Limit and Are Not Required to Cover Certain Preventive Services. “The ACA requires group health plans to meet certain standards that HRAs can’t meet, specifically the ban on annual and lifetime limits and the requirement to cover certain preventive services at no cost to plan enrollees. (HRAs by definition contain an annual limit on the amount of the employer’s contribution, and they are just accounts that do not cover any benefits.)” [Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, 11/29/17]

Increasing Access To Standalone HRAs Could Incentivize Businesses To Offer Limited Coverage HRAs Instead Of Full Health Coverage. “If the Administration attempts to broaden the availability of such “standalone” HRAs, that would likely prompt fewer businesses to offer health coverage to their employees.  Workers who now have good coverage and substantial contributions from an employer could see those benefits dropped and replaced with an HRA that leaves them paying higher premiums for less comprehensive coverage than what they have today.” [Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, 11/29/17]

HRAs Could Raise Premiums in the Individual Market By Drawing Healthy People Out Of Individual Market. “Depending on the specific proposals, and what employers do in response, HRAs could negatively affect the individual market by moving more high-cost people into that risk pool, raising overall premiums, and leaving other individual-market consumers and the federal government (through the premium tax credit) paying more.” [Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, 11/29/17]

American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network, American Heart Association, America’s Health Insurance plans, Blue Cross Blue Shield Association, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation, Epilepsy Foundation, Families USA, March of Dimes, The National Multiple Sclerosis Society Are Opposed to Expanding HRAs: “Expanding and extending short-term, limited-duration health plans, increasing enrollment in Association Health Plans (AHPs), and relaxing rules for employer Health Reimbursement Arrangements (HRAs) all increase adverse selection in insurance markets that serve millions of individuals and employers. We are concerned that this could create or expand alternative, parallel markets for health coverage, which would lead to higher premiums for consumers, particularly those with pre-existing conditions. Further, these actions destabilize the health insurance markets that guarantee access to comprehensive health coverage regardless of health status.” [Letter to State Departments of Insurance, 12/14/17]

Ignoring Will of Voters, Wisconsin Republicans Seek to Cement Their Assault on People with Pre-Existing Conditions

Washington, D.C. – Today, Wisconsin Republicans will hold hearings on a “sweeping plan” to weaken the powers held by Governor-elect Tony Evers and Attorney General-elect Josh Kaul before they take office, including preventing the next Attorney General from withdrawing from the Republican lawsuit to end pre-existing conditions protections. Leslie Dach, chair of Protect Our Care, released the following statement in response:

“On Election Day, voters across Wisconsin rejected the Walker-Schimel war on health care and elected Tony Evers and Josh Kaul to protect their care, starting with maintaining strong pre-existing condition protections. Now, Wisconsin Republicans want to use the lame-duck legislative session to overturn the will of the voters and jam their pro-repeal agenda down the throats of Wisconsinites, which is absolute lunacy and a slap in the face of democracy. If Wisconsin Republicans succeed in passing this legislation, they’ll put 2.4 million Wisconsinites with pre-existing conditions in the crosshairs of their relentless war on health care and prove just how phony Scott Walker’s failed campaign promises to protect people with pre-existing conditions were.”

BACKGROUND

2,435,700 Wisconsinites Live With A Pre-Existing Condition. About one in two Wisconsinites, 51 percent, lives with a pre-existing condition. [Center for American Progress, 4/5/17]

1,187,000 Wisconsin Women And Girls Have A Pre-Existing Condition. Approximately 1,187,000 women and girls in Wisconsin live with a pre-existing condition. [Center for American Progress and the National Partnership For Women and Families, June 2018]

308,100 Wisconsin Children Already Have A Pre-Existing Condition. Roughly 308,000 Wisconsinites below age 18 live with a pre-existing condition. [Center for American Progress, 4/5/17]

616,900 Older Wisconsinites Live With A Pre-Existing Condition. 616,900 Wisconsin adults between the ages of 55 and 64 live with at least one pre-existing condition, meaning attacks on these protections significantly threaten Wisconsinites approaching Medicare age. [Center for American Progress, 4/5/17]

THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT OUTLAWED DISCRIMINATION BASED ON PRE-EXISTING CONDITIONS

Because Of The Affordable Care Act, Insurance Companies Can No Longer Deny Coverage Or Charge More Because Of Pre-Existing Conditions. Under current law, health insurance companies can’t refuse to cover you or charge you more just because you have a ‘pre-existing condition’ — that is, a health problem you had before the date that new health coverage starts.” [HHS]

The ACA Outlawed Medical Underwriting, The Practice That Let Insurance Companies Charge Sick People And Women More. As the Brookings Institution summarizes, “The ACA outlawed medical underwriting, which had enabled insurance carriers to court the healthiest customers while denying coverage to people likely to need costly care. The ACA guaranteed that all applicants could buy insurance and that their premiums would not be adjusted for gender or personal characteristics other than age and smoking.”

The ACA Stopped Companies From Charging Women More Than Men For The Same Plan. The Affordable Care Act eliminated “gender rating,” meaning American women no longer have to pay an aggregated $1 billion more per year than men for the same coverage.

Thanks To The Affordable Care Act, Insurance Companies Can No Longer Rescind Coverage Because of Illness. Because of the ACA, insurance companies can no longer rescind or cancel someone’s coverage arbitrarily if they get sick.

HEALTH CARE WAS THE TOP ISSUE FOR WISCONSIN VOTERS

A Public Policy Polling election day survey of Wisconsin voters found that health care was the top issue for voters in the state — and that they overwhelmingly favored Democrats on it, propelling Tony Evers to victory.

  • 68% of voters said that health care was either a very important issue, or the most important issue to them. Those voters supported Evers over Scott Walker 65-33.
  • When asked to name the single issue most important to them in 2018, a plurality (27%) picked health care. Among those voters who said health care was their single most important issue in the election, Evers defeated Walker by a whopping 89-7 margin.
  • Evers especially had an advantage over Walker when it came to the issue of who voters trusted more to protect people with pre-existing conditions. 50% preferred Evers to protect pre-existing conditions to only 41% who preferred Walker.
  • Scott Walker’s support for the Republican health care repeal agenda hurt him badly. Only 32% of voters said his support for repeal made them more likely to vote for him, while 47% said it made them less likely to support him.
  • An overwhelming majority of Wisconsinites want to see the Affordable Care Act stay in place – 62% think it should be kept with fixes made to it as necessary, compared to only 32% of voters who support repealing it.